Navigationsweiche Anfang

Navigationsweiche Ende

Sprache wählen

Kontakt

Europäisches Institut für Internationale Wirtschaftsbeziehungen

Rainer-Gruenter-Str. 21
D-42119 Wuppertal

Tel: +49-(0)202-439 1371
Fax: +49-(0)202-439 1377
Mobil: +49-(0)174-702 0924

welfens(at)eiiw.uni-wuppertal.de

Aktuelles

  • Post-Corona Wirtschaftsaufschwungsperspektiven in Deutschland, Europa und weltweit
    Am 29. April hielt Prof. Welfens einen Vortrag vor der Fachgruppe FiWiSo des bdvbs zum Thema... [mehr]
  • Corona vaccination regulation: Vaccination schedule in Germany contradictory and flawed
    *Germany’s federal government once-in-a-century decision on vaccinations is partly contradictory. ... [mehr]
  • PM: Corona-Impfplanung Deutschland: Viel zu langsam und unsinnig
    * Unmögliche Impfplanung der Politik * Spätzulassung Impfstoff von Biontech in EU ist unakzeptabel *... [mehr]
  • Invitation Zoom Digital Seminar: The International Economics of the Corona Shock
    The International Economics of the Corona Shock Zoom Digital Seminar Date: 8 July 2020 Time:... [mehr]
  • New discussion paper from Lucas Bretschger and Elise Grieg (ETH Zürich) and Paul Welfens and Tian Xiong (EIIW/University of Wuppertal)
    Bretschger, L.; Grieg, E.; Welfens, P.J.J.; Xiong, T.: Corona Fatality Development, Medical... [mehr]
zum Archiv ->

Welfens, P.J.J./Baier, F./Kadiric, S./Korus, A./Xiong, T.: EU28 Capital Market Perspectives of a Hard BREXIT: Theory, Empirical Findings and Policy Options

Welfens, P.J.J./Baier, F./Kadiric, S./Korus, A./Xiong, T.: EU28 Capital Market Perspectives of a Hard BREXIT: Theory, Empirical Findings and Policy Options

 

JEL classification: F02, F4, F21, G1, G2

Key words: BREXIT, capital markets, credit spreads, FDI, growth

 

Summary

Key aspects covered refer to the cost of leaving the EU and in particular the implications for corporate bond risk premiums in the UK and the Eurozone: The gap between the interest rates of corporate bonds and government bonds could increase in the UK and Eurozone, respectively, as a result of BREXIT where the 2016 BREXIT referendum itself is considered to be a first BREXIT event (see the empirical findings), followed by the main BREXIT event, namely the day of officially leaving the EU - possibly as a No-deal BREXIT. It is as yet not clear what type of BREXIT will be implemented – hard versus soft – and it is also unclear what type of free trade agreement the EU and the UK could accomplish post-BREXIT. However, it is obviously necessary to carefully consider the background of the BREXIT dynamics and to then refer to various versions of BREXIT if one is to understand the inherent politico-economic dynamics of BREXIT – with a No-deal case representing an analytical benchmark which most politicians in the British Parliament obviously would want to avoid; a simple way to indeed avoid this case, with obvious high costs for the British economy, is not easy to discern as the UK’s political system is fractured. If the safe-haven status of the UK should be impaired by BREXIT, the rise of government bond interest rates by 0.3% would stand for the same burden as the net UK contribution to the EU.

 

Download the paper