Navigationsweiche Anfang

Navigationsweiche Ende

Sprache wählen

Aktuelles

  • Invitation Zoom Digital Seminar: The International Economics of the Corona Shock
    The International Economics of the Corona Shock Zoom Digital Seminar Date: 8 July 2020 Time:... [mehr]
  • Klausureinsicht am 0107.2020: WiSe 19/20 / Exam Review Winter term 19/20
    Am 01.07.2020 findet in FN.00.01 die Klausureinsicht für folgende Klausuren aus dem Wintersemester... [mehr]
  • New discussion paper from Lucas Bretschger and Elise Grieg (ETH Zürich) and Paul Welfens and Tian Xiong (EIIW/University of Wuppertal)
    Bretschger, L.; Grieg, E.; Welfens, P.J.J.; Xiong, T.: Corona Fatality Development, Medical... [mehr]
  • Prof. Paul J.J. Welfens zu den EU-Finanzhilfen am 19.05.20
    YouTube Video [mehr]
  • New Discussion Paper: Corona World Recession and Health System Crisis: Shocks Not Understood So Far
    Summary: The Coronavirus World Recession is a global symmetric shock that will cause... [mehr]
zum Archiv ->

Bretschger, L.; Grieg, E.; Welfens, P.J.J.; Xiong, T.: Corona Fatality Development, Health Indicators and the Environment: Empirical Evidence for OECD Countries

Bretschger, L.; Grieg, E.; Welfens, P.J.J.; Xiong, T.: Corona Fatality Development, Health Indicators and the Environment: Empirical Evidence for OECD Countries

 

 

JEL classification: F00, F01, I18, Q50

Key words: Coronavirus Pandemic, Case Fatalities, OECD Countries, Health Systems, Economic Development, Policy

Summary:

This paper presents empirical results on coronavirus fatality rates from cross-country regressions for OECD countries. We include medical, environmental and policy variables in our analysis to explain the death rates when holding case rates constant. We find that the share of the aged population, obesity rates, and local air pollution levels have a positive effect on fatality rates across the different estimation equations, while the share of smokers is not significant in most specifications. The strategy of aiming to achieve herd immunity has a significant positive effect on death rates. Other medical and policy variables discussed in the public sphere do not show a significant impact in our regressions. An evaluation of the different policy stringencies yields mixed results. Our results suggest that improving local air quality helps reduce the negative effects of a coronavirus pandemic significantly. Moreover, we conclude that contributions to certain multilateral organizations’, including the WHO, should not only refer to standard elements of payments such as income (or trade) but also to the share of the population aged 65 years and over and PM2.5 indicators.

Download the paper